Hughes v R: Assessing significant probative value for tendency evidence

In a 4:3 decision, the High Court handed down judgement today in Hughes v R. In doing so it resolved a divergence between the VSCA and the NSWCCA regarding how to determine whether tendency evidence has significant probative value.

Continue reading “Hughes v R: Assessing significant probative value for tendency evidence”

Advertisements

New ‘revenge porn’ offences for NSW

The NSW Parliament is in the process of legislating to criminalise the non-consensual sharing of intimate images. The new offences follow in the footsteps of, but goes further than, similar laws in South Australia and Victoria – which are both limited to distribution and do not provide the same level of detail with regard to important definitional issues, such as what constitutes consent.

Continue reading “New ‘revenge porn’ offences for NSW”

Smith v The Queen; The Queen v Afford

In Smith v The Queen; The Queen v Afford the High Court has held that reasoning adopted in Kural regarding inferring intent to import drugs is applicable to offences under s 307.1 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code (the Code). In doing so, the High Court has resolved a difference between the Victorian Supreme Court of Appeal (VSCA) and the NSWCCA.

Continue reading “Smith v The Queen; The Queen v Afford”

Attention to detail: Jimenez v R [2017] NSWCCA 1 (27 January 2017)

By Sam Hartridge

Jimenez v R [2017] NSWCCA 1 (27 January 2017)

The applicant was found in possession of a USB with photos of a young girl at Sydney airport.

This matter was an application to the Supreme Court for review of a local court conviction under Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 91H(2) – possess child abuse material. The offender applied for leave to appeal to the District Court, which was denied. So he applied the Supreme Court under s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001.

Continue reading “Attention to detail: Jimenez v R [2017] NSWCCA 1 (27 January 2017)”